Inked Forums Inked Magazine

Inked Magazine » Inked Network » Forums » General Discussion » just me, or are some of the inked girls gross?

Just Me, Or Are Some Of The Inked Girls Gross?

posted on May 12, 2008, 02:50PM

by vthomlinson

10 replies

so i was browsing around the inked girls gallery.. and some of those girls are really gross.. there are tons of girls with really bad tattoos and funky faces and they look like they had their picture taken with a prepaid camera phone in a woodshack behind their house.. i even clicked on one girl who had her pie right up in the camera.. it was so nasty.. there wasn't even a tattoo anywhere near it.. she could have easily worn some panties and made the photo 30 times better.. there just seems to be no quality control in that gallery.. there is a huge majority of pictures with girls that don't even have tattoos.. or if they do.. it's a tiny little postage stamp sized one and it's not even a part of the photo..

i'm just saying.. if inked wants to appoint me to go through and delete the skanky photos.. i will..

by teqdarlin on May 12, 2008, 03:56PM

Haha.!! I was thinking that exact same thing!..I don't know about anyone else but i sure don't want to see some used up snatch, sorry..people. I so apprecite the beautiful girls that can have ink and still look sexy and classy. I mean any girl can have ink, but to still look classy is a whole other story!

Thx ;)

by Maemi on May 12, 2008, 04:16PM

AGREED!

Ugh thank you for posting this!!

by tattooedcowboy on May 12, 2008, 04:18PM

Sad Sad Sad, There are a lot beautiful women but no tats,or one little tat you can barley see. I thought tats were the reason for voting in the gallery.
Then the ugly ones, bad posing, really crappy tats. I would be ashamed to even show myself on the street let alone in a great mag.
Tattooedcowboy

by SuicideBlonde on May 12, 2008, 04:53PM in response to tattooedcowboy from 12-May-08 @ 04:18PM

Well....i would guess that everyone has their own standard's....i would hope that there are "specific standards" that justifies who makes the grade so to speak....(filtering out
the nasty stuff would be nice thou....LOL

by nater on May 12, 2008, 06:01PM

very good point. maybe the ugly ones get tattoos as a distraction "hey if i get insane amounts of tattoos maybe they wont notice my walrus like features". and the good looking girls with no tattoos are probably looking for more attention, cause god knows they need it. thats just my theory.

by vthomlinson on May 12, 2008, 06:45PM in response to nater from 12-May-08 @ 06:01PM

well.. i've noticed that there are people out there with "inkedfever".. where they think that any girl with tattoos is hot.. it's ridiculous.. my friend has it and he will see some nasty girl with tons of tattoos and all of a sudden she is "so hot".. oh.. it grosses me out.

by vthomlinson on May 12, 2008, 07:23PM in response to vthomlinson from 12-May-08 @ 06:45PM

well.. to be fair.. i kinda have latinafever.. just about every latina i see is cute to me. makes me want to move out of santa monica and into the heart of east los.

by madmadmatthew on May 13, 2008, 07:59AM

yeah i havent looked at the inked girls gallery since the first week it was up, gross chicks in there (although there are MANY gorgeous girls in there too, so its not completely useless). they should def hire u to keep it under control!

by Veloria on May 13, 2008, 09:04AM

Just do like I do. I give the girls who show off their tattoos and look classy high scores. If I girl is showing to much and looks like a skank they get a 1. Maybe if enough people did this it would raise the standards a bit.

by prowl on May 13, 2008, 12:29PM

thank you!!!!!!!!!
nuff said.